Skip to content
Discover innovative marketing solutions at GlobalMark. Boos…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine Trump's Political Legacy - as well as America's Role in the Global Order

In the wake of launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the state-building business.

In a remarkable media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president stated that US forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a team comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" entails is unclear, but the commitment marks an abrupt shift in direction for the president, full of inconsistencies and formidable challenges.

A president who campaigned against "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been eroded by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He pledged to enlist American energy companies to repair Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, supplying financing for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has redefined Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has shown that he is more than willing to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike past operations, which have mostly involved rockets and aircraft that reduce the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are notably different.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be hard for some of Trump's supporters to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's endless use of force and backing for foreign wars is understandable because we are compelled to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and legitimate".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and assets that are central to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will provoke broader questions in global politics, however, and impact American relations with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were more direct.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a autocrat with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform congressional leaders before launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a triumph – with zero American casualties and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competency in US history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a hemisphere that is bound to be wary of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

The writer

Philip Benjamin

Milan Visser is a seasoned marketing strategist with over a decade of experience in digital marketing and brand development.

GlobalMark

Type to search articles.